{"v":2,"task":"Expert review: Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review (testnet vault)","deliverable":{"type":"text","prompt":"A review report: the steps you took per scenario, your findings with severity and how to reproduce them, your recommendations, with screenshots"},"campaign":"call-call-2","access":"invite","call":{"slug":"call-2","leg":"entries","mode":"hire","kind":"review","subject":{"name":"Kyoto Trip Helper","version":"1.0","where":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto"},"scenarios":["Ask it for the best time of year to visit Kyoto.","Ask it for three temples to see in one day."],"title":"Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review (testnet vault)","lede":"A small travel agent for first-time visitors to Kyoto.","poster":"ixo1ew49er…qrtn","points":[20,20,20,20,20],"money":{"prize":0,"runnersN":0,"runnersEach":0,"entryEach":0.1,"entryUpTo":1},"closes":"2026-10-25T06:18:17.488Z","drop":"2026-10-25T06:18:17.488Z","pick":"2026-10-25T06:18:17.488Z","blocks":[{"kind":"story","paragraphs":["I built it for friends visiting Japan and want an honest outside check."]},{"kind":"start","prompt":"I'm taking part in the IXO Expert Review \"Kyoto Trip Helper 1.0 review (testnet vault)\". Show me what the review asks for, then help me try each scenario and keep notes and screenshots as I go: what I did, what I expected and what I saw. Write up my findings with me, each with how serious it is and how to reproduce it, and my recommendations. Show me all of it, and hand it in as my report only when I say so."}]},"criteria":[{"id":"present","kind":"measure","gate":{"id":"non-empty"}},{"id":"length","kind":"measure","gate":{"id":"min-length","chars":200}},{"id":"l1","kind":"judge","text":"Every scenario in the brief has a step with what was done, what was expected, what was observed, and a result. Fail this only if a scenario in the brief has no step."},{"id":"l2","kind":"judge","text":"Every finding names the step it came from, what was observed against what was expected, and its impact on the user. Fail this only if a finding has no step, no observation or no impact."},{"id":"l3","kind":"judge","text":"Every blocker says how to reproduce it, or what is missing to reproduce it. Fail this only if a blocker says neither."},{"id":"l4","kind":"judge","text":"Every severity says why it is that severe, in terms of what the user could and could not do. Fail this only if a severity gives no reason."},{"id":"l5","kind":"judge","text":"The summary names the version tested, the devices or environment, and the dates. Fail this only if the version tested is missing."},{"id":"r1","kind":"judge","text":"The answer is a review report, either written out or attached as a PDF. It says what was checked, when, where and what was in scope, and the outcome; lists the steps taken, each with what was expected and what was seen, passed, failed, blocked, not tested or left out; lists the findings, each with its impact and a severity of blocker, major or minor with why, and every major finding says how to reproduce it (a blocker says how, or what is missing to reproduce it); gives recommendations, each with a priority and what would show it is done; and gives the review's limitations."}],"judge":{"kind":"oracle","address":"ixo175rlze3q6gap5ddxzc6m92u2ahw7a9h8n4uksq","rewardUixo":0},"approver":"ixo1ew49er8w99q0lwxhrhwj3lnznslxf7uhzaqrtn","report":{"sections":[]},"via":"mcp"}